Part I · The Word and the Christ
πλήρωμα
Plērōma PLAY-ro-ma
fullness
“All of God in One Body”
How much of God was in Jesus?
It is the question that has bothered every Christian who has stopped to think about it for more than a moment. Some heretics in the early church said Jesus was just a man God adopted. Some said He was a created being, less than God. Some said He was a kind of in-between figure, partly divine and partly created. Some said He was God who only seemed to have a body.
The New Testament’s most concentrated answer fits in one verse and turns on one Greek word.
The verse is Colossians 2:9: “For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily.” The word is plērōma — fullness, the whole of something. The whole of God dwells in Christ. Bodily. Not partly. Not approximately. Not in a way that bypasses His actual flesh. All of God. In one body.
This is the chapter where that confession gets its weight.
The Word
πλήρωμα (plērōma), pronounced PLAY-ro-ma. A neuter noun, third declension. From the verb plēroō (πληρόω), “to fill, to fulfill, to complete.” The family includes the adjective plērēs (full) and the noun plērōsis (fulfillment).
At its lexical baseline, plērōma simply means “that which fills” or “the condition of being full.” A patch sewn onto a garment to fill a hole is a plērōma (Mark 2:21). The leftover food that filled the disciples’ baskets after Jesus fed the five thousand is a plērōma (Mark 6:43). The everyday sense is concrete and unremarkable: it is the stuff that fills the gap.
The theological use builds on the lexical baseline. The plērōma of God is what fills divinity — not a piece of God, not a representation of God, but the whole of God. When Paul reaches for plērōma to describe what dwells in Christ, he is reaching for a word that already means “the whole of something.” He is not saying “a divine quality” or “a measure of God’s nature.” He is saying everything.
Range of Meaning
In its New Testament usage, plērōma covers a wider field than the theological sense alone:
- That which fills something. The patch in a garment (Mark 2:21, Matt 9:16). The everyday sense.
- The leftover or remainder — what fills the basket after a meal (Mark 6:43, 8:20).
- The condition of being full, completeness, totality.
- The fullness of God or of Christ — the dominant theological use in Paul.
- The fullness of time — a temporal sense meaning the completion or ripening of an appointed period (Gal 4:4, Eph 1:10).
- The church as the fullness of Christ — a derivative theological use (Eph 1:23).
The word’s center of gravity is the idea of completion or totality. What fills something to its full measure is the plērōma of that thing. When Paul applies the word to God, he is saying that God in His entirety — not God in part, not a divine extension, not a divine subset — has taken up residence in Christ.
Where You’ll Meet It
“For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell.” (Colossians 1:19, ESV)
The first of the two great plērōma passages in Colossians. Paul has just called Christ the image of the invisible God and the firstborn of all creation (we met that verse in Chapter 5 on eikōn). Now he says why the image is reliable: the fullness of God was pleased to dwell in Him. The dwelling is not an accident or an arrangement of convenience. It is what God wanted. The Father purposed it.
“For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily.” (Colossians 2:9, ESV)
The verse that has carried more christological weight than perhaps any other in the New Testament. Paul says it more sharply than he did in Colossians 1: the whole fullness, of deity (not merely “God” but the divine essence itself), dwells (present tense, ongoing) — bodily. The Greek is sōmatikōs — “in bodily form.” Not in some abstract spiritual mode. In the body. In the body of the man who walked through Galilee. The body now risen and reigning. The body Christians will receive at the rail next Sunday.
“For the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.” (Ephesians 1:23, ESV)
The first of the derived uses. Christ has a plērōma — Himself in His fullness — and the church is being drawn into that fullness. The church is not the plērōma in the way Christ is, but the church participates in Christ’s plērōma. The fullness in Christ overflows into His body.
“That you may be filled with all the fullness of God.” (Ephesians 3:19, ESV)
Paul’s prayer for the Ephesian church. He prays that they may be filled with the plērōma of God — meaning the fullness that dwells in Christ. Not a separate fullness available apart from Christ. The same fullness, reaching Christians through Him.
“And from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace.” (John 1:16, ESV)
John says it differently but says the same thing. The fullness Christians receive comes from the plērōma of Christ. There is no other source. The Father’s gifts to His people flow through the Son, who contains the fullness.
“But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law…” (Galatians 4:4, ESV)
The temporal sense. The plērōma of time — the appointed moment when the ages had reached their ripeness — is when God sent His Son. The word does different work here, but the underlying meaning of completeness still governs. When the time was full, He came.
What Confessional Lutherans Hear
Plērōma — fullness
We hear plērōma with two emphases the broader Christian conversation often softens.
First, all of God dwells in one body. The classical Christian confession is that Christ is fully God and fully man. Most lay readers know that confession formulaically. Plērōma gives the formula its sharpest verse. Colossians 2:9 says the whole fullness of deity dwells in Christ — and dwells sōmatikōs, bodily. Not partly. Not approximately. Not in a way that hovers outside the flesh and uses the flesh as a vehicle. The fullness of God is in the body.
This matters for two-natures Christology. The divine nature of the Son did not stand apart from the human nature He assumed. The two natures are united in one Person, without confusion and without separation. Whatever Christ does in His humanity, the Person doing it is fully God. Whatever can be said of His divinity can be predicated of the man Jesus. Lutheran theology calls this the communicatio idiomatum — the communication of attributes — and it rides directly on plērōma. If the fullness of God dwells bodily in Christ, then the attributes of God belong to the body in which the fullness dwells.
The Reformed tradition has tended to qualify the bodily indwelling — out of a real concern to protect divine transcendence, but in a way Lutherans believe qualifies too much. The Reformed concern is that the infinite divine nature cannot be wholly contained in the finite human body of Jesus, and so the divine Son must also continue to exist and act apart from the flesh during the incarnation. Lutherans push back. Paul does not qualify. The fullness dwells bodily. We do not parse what God can or cannot fit into; we listen to what He has actually said about Himself, and He has said the whole fullness dwells in the body of His Son.
This matters not just christologically but sacramentally. We will return to this in Chapter 32 on sōma, but the connection should be flagged here: if the fullness of God dwells bodily in Christ, then where Christ is bodily present, the fullness of God is present. The Lutheran confession of Christ’s real bodily presence in the Supper is not a separate piece of theology bolted on to Christology. It is Christology pressed into the Eucharist.
Second, the fullness is in Christ — and only in Christ. Paul is writing Colossians against false teachers in Colossae who were apparently suggesting that divine reality required mediation through other intermediary beings: angels, spiritual hierarchies, secret knowledge, ascetic discipline. The exact contours of the Colossian heresy are debated by scholars, but the shape of Paul’s response is not. Whatever divine fullness anyone might be seeking, it is in Christ. Not in angels. Not in cosmic intermediaries. Not in spiritual hierarchies. Christ is the totality.
For modern readers, the temptation is different but related. We are tempted to look for divine fullness in spiritual experience, in mystical encounter, in inner illumination, in the favorite teacher, in religious technique, in the next conference. Paul’s answer is unchanged. The fullness is in Christ. The means of grace deliver Christ. There is no plērōma elsewhere to find.
The pastoral payoff: when you wonder whether God has held something back from you — some secret deeper experience, some hidden tier of spiritual life, some access reserved for the spiritually advanced — the answer is no. The whole fullness is in Christ, and Christ is given to you in the gospel preached, the water poured, the bread broken. There is no further plērōma to seek.
The full entry in Just Enough Greek continues with “Where People Get It Wrong,” “So What,” and “If You Want to Go Deeper.”