Part VI · The Church and Her Ministry
ἐκκλησία
Ekklēsia
church, assembly
“The Assembly Around the Word and Table”
You have probably heard, somewhere along the way, that the Greek word for “church” means “called-out ones.” Pastors, Sunday school teachers, and popular Bible-study authors have repeated this etymological claim for generations. The word, they say, is ekklēsia — from ek (“out of”) and kaleō (“to call”) — and so the church is the assembly of those who have been “called out” of the world to follow Christ.
This is the etymological fallacy the opening of this book warned about. The claim is half-true in the way that many etymological claims about Greek words are half-true: the elements of the compound (ek and kaleō) are really present, but the active meaning of the word in actual first-century Greek usage had long since faded from those etymological roots. By the time the New Testament was written, ekklēsia did not mean “called-out ones” to a Greek speaker any more than “breakfast” means “breaking the fast” to an English speaker. It means the morning meal. The etymology is interesting; it is not the active meaning of the word.
What ekklēsia actually meant in first-century Greek was assembly — particularly the assembly of citizens gathered for public business. In classical Athens, the ekklēsia was the citizens’ assembly, the highest governing body of the Athenian democracy, summoned by the herald to deliberate on the affairs of the city. The word was political and civic before it was religious. When Greek-speaking Jews translated the Hebrew Old Testament into the Septuagint, they used ekklēsia for the Hebrew qahal — the assembly of Israel gathered for worship and covenant. This is the lineage the New Testament inherits: the ekklēsia is the gathered assembly of God’s people, summoned together by the herald of the gospel, called to the purposes God has appointed for them.
This is the chapter on ekklēsia. It opens Part VI on the church and its offices. The chapter’s main task is to recover what ekklēsia actually means in the New Testament — assembly, gathering, the people of God called together — and to lay out the Lutheran answer to the questions of where this assembly is found and what makes it the church.
The Word
ἐκκλησία (ekklēsia), pronounced ek-klay-SEE-ah. A feminine noun. Etymologically a compound of ek (ἐκ, “out of, from”) and kaleō (καλέω, “to call”), as discussed above — but with the etymological elements having long since faded from the active meaning of the word. The family is small. The verbal form ekkaleō (ἐκκαλέω, “to call out, summon”) is rare; the primary New Testament usage is the noun ekklēsia itself. The broader kal- family (kaleō, klēsis, klētos) was treated in Chapter 40 on klēsis, and the connections are real, but the noun ekklēsia has developed its own distinctive theological weight in the New Testament.
The classical Greek background is essential because it shapes what first-century hearers would have heard when the apostles used the word. In Athens, the ekklēsia was the citizens’ assembly — the governing body of the democracy. Free male citizens (perhaps 30,000 to 50,000 of the population, depending on the period) had the right to attend. The assembly met regularly on a hill called the Pnyx, summoned by the herald (kēryx) whose proclamation called the citizens together. The assembly voted on matters of war and peace, on the passing of laws, on the election of magistrates, on the ostracism of citizens who had become dangerous to the city. The ekklēsia was where the city’s public business was conducted; it was the place where the gathered citizens exercised their authority. The word was political before it was religious.
When the Athenian democracy declined and Greek became the lingua franca of the eastern Mediterranean under Alexander’s successors and then under Rome, the word ekklēsia persisted in use for various kinds of public assemblies. The political dimension softened over time; the word came to mean simply “assembly” in a more general sense, applied to any deliberative or convened gathering. Acts 19 preserves this usage in its classical political form, where the assembly of the city of Ephesus (the silversmith riot) is called an ekklēsia three times (Acts 19:32, 39, 41). The word was capable of either secular or religious application; the New Testament’s specifically religious development of the word does not erase its broader Greek background but builds on it.
The Septuagint background is decisive for the New Testament’s theological use. When the Hebrew Old Testament was translated into Greek beginning in the third century BC, the translators consistently used ekklēsia for the Hebrew qahal (קָהָל, “assembly, congregation, gathering”). The qahal in the Old Testament is the gathered congregation of Israel, particularly for worship and covenant — the assembly at Sinai, the assembly that hears the reading of the law, the assembly that gathers at the Tabernacle and Temple. Deuteronomy uses qahal Yahweh — translated into Greek as ekklēsia kyriou, “the assembly of the LORD” — for the gathered covenant people (Deut 23:1–3, 8; 1 Chr 28:8). The word ekklēsia in the Septuagint was already a theologically loaded term for God’s gathered people before any New Testament writer ever picked up a pen.
This is the inheritance the apostles draw on. When Jesus tells Peter, “on this rock I will build my ekklēsia” (Matt 16:18), He is not coining a new term. He is invoking the entire Septuagint history of qahal Yahweh — the assembly of God’s people — and locating Himself at its center as the one who will build it. The ekklēsia He builds is in continuity with the qahal of Israel and in fulfillment of God’s purposes for a gathered covenant people.
Range of Meaning
In its New Testament usage, ekklēsia covers:
- A local Christian assembly — the gathered believers in a particular city or household. The dominant New Testament usage. “The church in Corinth,” “the church in Ephesus,” “the church that meets in their house.”
- The universal church — the whole gathered people of God in Christ, across all places and times. Particularly in Ephesians and Colossians: “Christ is the head of the ekklēsia.”
- The eschatological assembly — the gathered people of God in their final state. Hebrews 12:23 names “the assembly of the firstborn enrolled in heaven.”
- A general assembly in the secular sense — the citizens’ or civic assembly. Acts 19 preserves this usage for the Ephesian crowd.
The dominant theological usages are the first two. The New Testament uses ekklēsia for both the local congregation and the universal church without distinction in vocabulary — the same word covers both because the same gathering principle is at work in both. The local ekklēsia in Corinth is the universal ekklēsia as it appears in that particular place. The universal ekklēsia is the gathering of all the local ekklēsiai across all times and places. The relationship is not abstract-to-concrete or whole-to-part in any rigid sense; the local assembly is the universal assembly in local manifestation, and the universal assembly is the local assemblies gathered together by the one Spirit into the one body of Christ.
Where You’ll Meet It
“And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18, ESV)
The first New Testament occurrence of ekklēsia on Jesus’s lips. The Greek is mou tēn ekklēsian — “my assembly.” The dispute over what “this rock” refers to (Peter as person, Peter as representative of the apostles, Peter’s confession of faith) is famous and not finally resolvable, though confessional Lutheran exegesis has generally followed the patristic-and-Reformation reading that the rock is Peter’s confession (“you are the Christ, the Son of the living God”) rather than Peter himself as person or office. What is not disputable: Christ promises that He Himself will build the ekklēsia, and that the ekklēsia He builds will outlast the gates of hell. The church is Christ’s church. The building is Christ’s doing. The endurance is Christ’s promise.
“If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church.” (Matthew 18:17, ESV)
The second of Jesus’s two uses of ekklēsia. The context is church discipline — the procedure for addressing sin between believers when private reconciliation fails. The ekklēsia here is clearly the local assembly, which has authority to address such matters. This verse contributes to the Lutheran understanding of the church as the gathered community with real authority entrusted by Christ, not merely as a collection of individuals.
“To the church of God that is in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints together with all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours…” (1 Corinthians 1:2, ESV)
Paul’s opening to 1 Corinthians. The salutation is rich. The church is named “the ekklēsia of God” (tē ekklēsia tou theou) — God’s assembly, not the Corinthians’ own. The location is specified — “in Corinth” — but the salutation immediately extends to “all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.” The local assembly is greeted alongside the universal assembly; the two are not separated; both are addressed in the one letter. This is the New Testament’s characteristic pattern: the local ekklēsia is the universal ekklēsia as it exists in that place, and the universal ekklēsia is the sum of the local ekklēsiai gathered into one body in Christ.
“And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent.” (Colossians 1:18, ESV)
Paul’s compressed Christological statement of what the church is and Whose it is. Christ is “the head of the body, the ekklēsia.” The church is His body — His own ongoing physical-spiritual extension in the world. He is the head. The head and the body are inseparable. The church derives its life from Christ; Christ exercises His ongoing ministry through the church; the believer participates in Christ by belonging to the body. This image — head and body — is one of the most powerful in the New Testament’s ecclesiology and runs through Paul’s letters in various forms.
“Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish.” (Ephesians 5:25–27, ESV)
The marriage analogy. The ekklēsia is Christ’s bride, and Christ’s love for her is sacrificial — He gave Himself up for her. The cleansing is “by the washing of water with the word” — a baptismal reference that connects the ekklēsia directly to the means of grace. The destination is eschatological: the bride presented “in splendor, without spot or wrinkle.” The church’s perfection is future and gift; her present existence is real but mixed, awaiting the eschatological purification Christ Himself will accomplish.
“But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, and to the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven…” (Hebrews 12:22–23, ESV)
The eschatological ekklēsia. The phrase “the assembly of the firstborn” is ekklēsia prōtotokōn — the assembly of those who are firstborn (a Christological title in Heb 1:6 and elsewhere, here applied to those who are conformed to the firstborn). The Hebrews author locates the church not on a particular earthly mountain but on the heavenly Mount Zion — already gathered with the angels, the saints made perfect, and Jesus the mediator of the new covenant. The church on earth participates in the heavenly assembly through the means of grace; the eschatological church is already real and present to faith.
“I will tell of your name to my brothers; in the midst of the congregation I will sing your praise.” (Hebrews 2:12, ESV, quoting Psalm 22:22)
The author of Hebrews quotes Psalm 22 and applies it to Christ. The “congregation” — ekklēsia in the Greek — is the gathered people of God among whom the risen Christ Himself sings the praise of the Father. This verse names something striking: Christ Himself is present in the ekklēsia, singing praise with His people. The church’s worship is not a human attempt to reach God; it is participation in Christ’s own worship of the Father, in the gathered assembly where He Himself is present.
What Confessional Lutherans Hear
Ekklēsia — church, assembly
We hear ekklēsia with two emphases that the broader Christian conversation often softens or mishandles.
First, the church is the assembly of believers where the gospel is purely preached and the sacraments are rightly administered. This is the foundational Lutheran definition of the church, given in Augsburg Confession Article VII:
“It is also taught that at all times there must be and remain one holy, Christian church. It is the assembly of all believers among whom the gospel is purely preached and the holy sacraments are administered according to the gospel.”[^1]
This is the notae ecclesiae — the marks of the church. Two marks: pure preaching of the gospel, and right administration of the sacraments. Where these are present, there is the church. Where they are absent or distorted, there is not the church — at least not in the proper sense. The marks are objective: they can be observed, confessed, and tested. The church is not located in a particular building, a particular hierarchy, a particular nation, or a particular feeling. It is located where the marks are present.
This Lutheran definition has substantial consequences. The church is not identified with any particular institutional structure. The Roman Catholic identification of the church with the Roman hierarchy and the papacy is rejected — the visible Roman church may have the marks where it preaches the gospel and administers the sacraments faithfully, but it is not the church because it is Roman; it is the church to the extent that the marks are present. The Anabaptist identification of the church with a purified, visibly holy community is rejected — the visible church on earth is mixed, and its marks do not require visible perfection. The modern American identification of “church” with personal spirituality independent of any gathered community is rejected — the marks of the church require an assembly, a Word preached, sacraments administered, all gathered around Christ’s appointed means.
This means the visible church on earth is, properly, a mixed reality. Some who appear to be members may not be (because they do not actually believe); some who do not appear to be members may yet be (because God alone knows the heart). The visible community gathered around Word and Sacrament is the form in which the true church appears in this world — but the true church is finally a matter of faith, known fully only to God.
The Lutheran tradition has handled this distinction with care. Properly speaking, the ekklēsia is the assembly of true believers, known fully only to God. As it appears in this world, the ekklēsia is the visible gathering around Word and Sacrament, with mixed membership. AC VIII addresses the mixed-membership question directly:
“Even though the Christian church is, properly speaking, the assembly of saints and those who truly believe, nevertheless, because in this life many false Christians, hypocrites, and even public sinners are mixed in with the godly, it is permissible to use the sacraments even when they are administered by ungodly priests.”[^2]
The sacraments are effective by God’s institution, not by the holiness of the minister or the purity of the visible congregation. The Word is the Word whether the preacher is holy or not. The Supper is Christ’s body and blood whether the communicant next to you is sincere or not. The Lutheran insistence on objective means of grace shapes how the church is identified and how the believer relates to the imperfect visible community he is part of. The believer does not need to verify the holiness of every other person in the pew before receiving the means of grace; Christ has given the means objectively, and they remain Christ’s means regardless of the spiritual condition of those administering or those receiving alongside.
Second, the unity of the church is grounded in the gospel and sacraments, not in uniform structures or ceremonies. AC VII continues:
“It is enough for the true unity of the Christian church that the gospel is preached harmoniously according to a pure understanding and the sacraments are administered in conformity with the divine Word. It is not necessary for the true unity of the Christian church that uniform ceremonies, instituted by human beings, be observed everywhere.”[^1]
The unity of the church is doctrinal and sacramental, not ceremonial or institutional. Where the gospel is preached and the sacraments are administered, the church is one — regardless of differences in liturgy, language, music, vestments, or organizational structure. This has been a Lutheran emphasis from the Reformation forward. Lutherans across the world hold the same faith and confess the same doctrine, even as they worship in many different languages, with many different liturgical practices, in many different organizational forms. The unity is in the substance, not in the visible uniformity.
This pushes back against:
- The Roman Catholic insistence that uniform structures under the papacy are essential to the church’s unity. Lutheran response: unity is in the gospel preached and the sacraments rightly administered, not in submission to a particular human office.
- The Eastern Orthodox insistence on uniformity of liturgical tradition and episcopal succession. Lutheran response: while liturgical continuity and pastoral oversight are good and salutary, they are not what constitutes the church’s unity.
- The Anabaptist purity model that grounds unity in the visible holiness of the gathered community. Lutheran response: the visible church on earth is mixed; the marks of the church do not require visible perfection.
- Modern denominational anxieties that treat institutional fragmentation as necessarily destroying the church’s unity. Lutheran response: the true church extends across denominational lines wherever the marks are present; institutional separation does not necessarily indicate ecclesial separation.
The pastoral payoff: when you go to church on Sunday, you are participating in the ekklēsia — the assembly of God’s people gathered around Word and Sacrament. The building you walk into is not the church; the institution that owns the building is not the church; the people who happen to be in your pew are not yet the church merely by being there. The church is the assembly gathered around Christ in the means He has appointed. As the gospel is preached and the sacraments administered, the church is present. You are part of the body. The body is Christ’s. The unity of the body is in the Christ who is the head.
This also has implications for how the believer chooses where to attend and how to relate to other Christian traditions. The Lutheran tradition has not been indifferent to where the believer attends — pure preaching and right administration matter, and where these are absent or distorted, the believer is not receiving the gifts Christ has given for his benefit. The Lutheran tradition has also recognized that the true church extends beyond Lutheran denominational structures. Wherever the gospel is preached and the sacraments rightly administered, with appropriate confessional content, there is the church.
The full entry in Just Enough Greek continues with “Where People Get It Wrong,” “So What,” and “If You Want to Go Deeper.”